NOTE: Since my blog is relatively new, I am trying to get “noticed” by search engines. Building readership helps, so if you like what you read, please do me a favor and like or share each article you think worthy, or follow my blog to be notified of updates. Also, it helps if you click on a link now and then. Thanks to all of those who are following me and reading my blog. God bless!!
This is the third article in a series disputing the generally accepted idea that Joseph was guilty of pride as a young man, bringing on an assault by his jealous brothers that led to Joseph being sold into slavery in Egypt.
The first item of evidence offered as proof of Joseph’s pride was the bad or evil report he made to his father, Jacob (Gen. 37:2).
The second item of evidence offered as proof of Joseph’s pride was that he wore the splendid coat gifted to him by Jacob (Gen. 37:3). Much has been written about this coat of Joseph’s, with too many commentators, preachers, and Bible scholars giving Joseph a bad grade for wearing the coat.
One writer surmised that Jacob, who felt that Joseph was being unduly picked on by his older brother, gave the coat to Joseph to make Joseph feel better about himself. In other words, the gift of the coat was primarily an issue of self-esteem. In the article, the author wrote, “We can assume at the very least that Joseph wore it with pride and perhaps a bit of smugness at being singled out for this special gift.” 
One pastor said in a sermon concerning Joseph, “Whatever this garment looked like, it is clear that Joseph proudly wore it as a constant reminder to his older brothers that Joseph was the favored son.” 
Another writer said, “Joseph himself is portrayed as a young man somewhat lacking in common sense, or perhaps simply a bit self-absorbed.” 
In each case, Joseph was either a troubled young man who did not know how to act civilly within the family, or he was simply filled with an overweening sense of pride and self-importance.
Let’s look more closely into the matter of this coat of many colors.
There is much debate and disagreement about the nature of the coat. The earliest English texts translate the Hebrew with “coat of many colors,” but later translations say it differently. 
KJV & NKJV: a coat of many colors (note that many is in italics, indicating that the word is not found in the oldest manuscripts but was added by translators to help clarify the text)
Amplified: a long tunic with sleeves
ESV & HCSB: a robe of many colors
NIV: a richly ornamented robe
RSV: a long robe with sleeves
NASB: a varicolored tunic (footnote: full-length robe)
Orthodox Jewish Bible: tunic reaching to palms and soles
New Century Version: a special robe with long sleeves
Dr. W. A. Criswell believed that the tunic was originally white “embroidered gorgeously around the skirt, and the sleeves, and the edges.” He taught that the robe was long enough to reach the hands and feet of the wearer, and was typically worn by those who did not have to work because of their status in society. 
According to Strong, the Hebrew word translated “coat” is kuttoneth, which referred to a tunic or undergarment, a long shirt-like garment usually made of linen. 
Easton’s Bible Dictionary describes the coat as “a garment long and full, such as was worn by the children of nobles…a long garment with sleeves… a coat of many pieces, i.e., a patchwork of many small pieces of divers colors.” He adds that this garment was “worn like a shirt next to the skin.” 
In Exodus and Leviticus, Moses used the same word to refer to the tunic worn by Aaron and the priests. When used in this context, the word is variously translated as “a specially woven tunic” (HCSB), as a “long and sleeved tunic of checkerwork” (Amplified, NASB), and as “a skillfully woven tunic” (NKJV).
Claude Mariottini, Professor of Old Testament, Northern Baptist Seminary, writes…
Since the ketonet passīm (Hebrew for “coat of many colors”) was the kind of garment that daughters of kings wore (See 2 Sam. 13:18), the garment probably was associated with people who were royalty, with officials who had high rank in the palace, or with people who had an exalted position in society. The fact that Jacob gave Joseph a ketonet passīm means that Jacob treated Joseph as a royal person, a person whom he considered to be above all his other sons. 
In summary, the coat Jacob gave to Joseph appears to show that Jacob did indeed love Joseph more than his other sons, signifying his favoritism by a public display. We might assume that Joseph reacted with pride because of his father’s favoritism, but to do so would only be an assumption, not biblical truth.
Again referring to Strong, the Hebrew word translated “colors” is the word pas, which literally meant “flat (of the hand or foot), palm, sole” and was used figuratively to refer to a “tunic reaching to palms and soles.” 
No one seems to know how this word was translated as “color” in the earliest translations (including the Latin Vulgate and the Septuagint), but many believe it was simply a mistake in translation that was carried over into the earliest English versions.
Once again, let’s look strictly at the text.
Genesis 37:3 Now Israel loved Joseph more than any other of his sons, because he was the son of his old age. And he made him a robe of many colors.
The Bible specifically states that the coat was not Joseph’s idea, but Jacob’s. If the sons of Jacob were going to be angry with someone, why not begin with their own father? If anyone was prideful in this story, that person was Jacob, not Joseph.
Jacob loved Joseph more than his other sons. To make sure that no one could mistake his favoritism, Jacob created a distinguishing tunic for Joseph to wear. Whether or not is was multi-colored or long enough to reach his feet and hands is not relevant to the story.
What made the coat a symbol of hatred to Joseph’s brothers was not its cut or color, nor the fact that Joseph wore it. What made them angry was the symbolism – the distinctive nature and purpose of the coat.
I remember when I was a lowly high school student. My dad worked hard and provided everything we needed and more. My mom was a terrific mother and home-maker. Both of them desired much more for their children than they could afford. But they gave us what they could and everything we needed, and they sacrificed to do it.
I was not a very popular person in high school, although I had a strong desire to be. I thought much of the cause of my unpopularity (which was truly a product of my own poor self-image) was due to my clothes. One of the most popular clothing items while I was in high school was a London Fog jacket. I craved and coveted a London Fog jacket – especially a navy blue one – that I could wear with the collar turned up like all the popular guys did.
My mom was aware of my desire, but could never have afforded to purchase one from a store. So she did the next best thing – she made me one. In color, it was light brown with a small hounds-tooth pattern. And the material was so limpid that the collar would never stand up. I am ashamed to admit it now, but I was ashamed to wear it then.
Nevertheless, I did wear it – nearly every day. Why? Because my mom made it for me. I certainly did not think the coat was anything special, but my mom was very special to me, as my siblings and I were special to her. I wore the coat out of respect for Mom.
Throughout the story of Joseph’s life, one personality characteristic that is very obvious to even the casual observer (except those prejudiced by preconceptions and traditions) is that Joseph had a heart of gold. I believe he wore his “coat of many colors” because his father went to the trouble of making it for him and expected him to wear it. To have refused to wear it would have been as offensive to his father as wearing it was to his brothers. Given the choice, whom should Joseph choose to offend?
There is no evidence whatsoever that Joseph wore the coat for the sole purpose of intentionally aggravating his brothers by rubbing their noses in their inferiority. The brothers were angry with Joseph and refused to even speak to him, but it was Jacob’s pride and the sinful jealousy of the brothers that caused their anger, not Joseph’s prideful display of his “coat of many colors.”
NEXT: Case 3, A Baffling Dream
 Kadden, Bruce. “From the Coat of Many Colors to a Simple Garment: The Unmaking of Joseph.” Used with permission.
 Strong’s Hebrew Lexicon, Online Bible Edition, Version 4.32.01, July 18, 2014, Copyright © 1987-2014, Larry Pierce, Winterbourne, Ontario, Canada NOB 2VO. Referenced hereafter as Online Bible.
 Easton’s Revised Bible Dictionary, Online Bible.
 Strong’s Hebrew Lexicon, Online Bible.